RackN

Making Patch Management More Resilient

Patch management is often seen as routine, but the report How to Balance Patch Management and Operational Resilience by Gartner® analysts Lina Al Dana, Todd Larivee, and Chris Saunderson shows that it is central to how IT Operations stay resilient and limit risk. It states that “a risk-based patch management approach enabled by I&O and security collaboration reduces risk and disruption. Heads of I&O can use this research to align patching with vulnerability management and operational priorities.”

Move Beyond Isolated Patching

Often, patch management is approached as a stand-alone activity. Updates are applied system by system, making an uneven environment where each system follows its own timeline. This separation adds complexity, makes success hard to measure, and can decrease trust in operations. Gartner® analysis warns that focusing only on patch counts and compliance metrics can create a false sense of security while leaving other potential vulnerabilities unaddressed.

Instead, the report outlines the importance of integrating patching with the broader vulnerability management program. By using shared playbooks and creating cross-functional workflows, friction between security and operations can be decreased and stability during updates is ensured.

Building Structured Patch Processes

Patching requires more than tools, it needs structure. Gartner® recommends formalizing patch management through clear responsibilities, shared procedures, and success measures tied to risk reduction rather than completion rates. This shift moves patching from a tactical task to a strategic function of I&O.

From an operational perspective, some take this further with an immutable deployment approach. Rather than patching components one at a time, they refresh entire systems or clusters. This speeds up the process, ensures consistency, and makes rollbacks easier. Others apply IaC methods to establish dev, test, and production cycles for updates. By making changes in controlled environments, service interruptions are minimized and deployment is less risky.

The Vulnerability Management Life Cycle

The report introduces a vulnerability management life cycle. The cycle is a five-step process of assessing, prioritizing, acting, reassess, and improving. This process helps patching be a continuous process rather than a periodic response. By linking patch management to exposure reduction, system resilience and security increases significantly.

“Organizations where I&O is actively involved in cybersecurity decision making are better positioned to align operational stability with security priorities, streamline remediation efforts and ultimately reduce risk more efficiently.” (Lina Al Dana et al., 2025)

Why Patch Management Matters for IT Operations

When patch management is in sync with resilience objectives, the benefits are tangible. Organizations see less vulnerability debt, faster adoption of new releases, better security posture, and greater ROI on infrastructure. By treating patching as a process rather than a one-off task, the ability to deliver stability, agility, and trust across an organization is increased.

Read the Full Gartner® Report

For the complete analysis on structured patch management, risk-based prioritization, and the vulnerability management life cycle, access the report today, complimentary of RackN.

gartner_logo

Disclaimers

Gartner, How to Balance Patch Management and Operational Resilience, Lina Al Dana, Todd Larivee, and Chris Saunderson, 29 July 2025

Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates in the U.S. and internationally and are used herein with permission. All rights reserved.

Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in its research publications, and does not advise technology users to select only those vendors with the highest ratings or other designation. Gartner research publications consist of the opinions of Gartner’s research organization and should not be construed as statements of fact. Gartner disclaims all warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this research, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *